# Re: DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?

Markus Stumpf (stumpf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de)
Fri, 10 Feb 1995 17:43:13 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Markus Stumpf: "Re: DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?"
- Previous message: Dan Connolly: "DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?"
- In reply to: Dan Connolly: "DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?"
- Next in thread: Markus Stumpf: "Re: DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?"

    Subject: Re: DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?

    From: Markus Stumpf <stumpf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>

    To: connolly@hal.com (Dan Connolly)

    Date: 	Fri, 10 Feb 1995 17:43:13 +0100

    In-Reply-To: <9502101507.AA22522@austin5.hal.com> from "Dan Connolly" at Feb 10, 95 04:07:20 pm

    Message-Id: <95Feb10.174322mesz.78054@hprbg5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>

|>It seems to me that we've had this discussion before, but I don't
|>remember the resolution. Any pointers?

Yeah, we had that discussion before and we never reached some point.
I really like the idea of always having the full URL in http requests.

Btw: There is another solution to this problem.
ifconfig supports on most platforms (at least with some minor patches)
"alias names". Thus your host can have more than one IP address
and you can start different httpds for different aliases.

We use this with FreeBSD and it works fine.

\Maex

    --
    ______________________________________________________________________________
     Markus Stumpf                        Markus.Stumpf@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE
                                    http://www.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~stumpf/

- Next message: Markus Stumpf: "Re: DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?"
- Previous message: Dan Connolly: "DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?"
- In reply to: Dan Connolly: "DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?"
- Next in thread: Markus Stumpf: "Re: DNS vs HOME PAGE[S]?"