# Re: x-uri draft

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Fri, 11 Nov 1994 16:42:07 PST

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Marc VanHeyningen: "Re: Shunned ports [was: Predraft of a new URL scheme: mailmsg ]"
- Previous message: Ned Freed: "Re: Predraft of a new URL scheme: mailmsg"

    To: martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk

    In-Reply-To: martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk's message of Tue, 8 Nov 1994 15:22:45 -0800 <94Nov8.152303pst.2763@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Subject: Re: x-uri draft

    From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>

    Message-Id: <94Nov11.164208pst.2760@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Date: 	Fri, 11 Nov 1994 16:42:07 PST

It might be more appropriate to discuss a proposal for a new header in
MIME/SMTP mail within a mail working group, and not in the URI working
group.

At one point, there was some desire to add a "url" access-type for
message/external-body. This would overlap the capabilities of "ftp"
and "anon-ftp". I don't know if the x-url header would fit into that
context, but it would be another way to get URL-denoted resources
references by a mail message.

- Next message: Marc VanHeyningen: "Re: Shunned ports [was: Predraft of a new URL scheme: mailmsg ]"
- Previous message: Ned Freed: "Re: Predraft of a new URL scheme: mailmsg"