# Re: Persistent Documents and Locations

Jim Conklin (conklin@info.cren.net)
Mon, 21 Aug 1995 15:10:13 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Karen R. Sollins: "Re: Persistent Documents and Locations"
- Previous message: lazear@dockside.mitre.org: "Re: Persistent Documents and Locations"

    Message-Id: <199508211907.PAA06342@info.cren.net>

    Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 15:10:13 +0100

    To: "Karen R. Sollins" <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>, uri@bunyip.com

    From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin)

    Subject: Re: Persistent Documents and Locations

At 11:21 AM 8/21/95 -0400, Karen R. Sollins wrote:
>Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something, but it seems to me that
>dangling references (whether they are URNs or URLs or anything else)
>will always have validity in some cases. ...

Thanks, Karen, for such a nice explanation of why we'll always have to
deal with unresolvable URL's and URN's!
I've been bothered by what appreared to me a the unreasonable assumption
that we shouldn't have such things, and I realy like your explanation and
example of why that assumption is false.

Jim

- Next message: Karen R. Sollins: "Re: Persistent Documents and Locations"
- Previous message: lazear@dockside.mitre.org: "Re: Persistent Documents and Locations"