# Re: URI Revised charter proposal

Erik Jul (jul@oclc.org)
Thu, 6 Jul 1995 13:55:47 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Karen R. Sollins: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Previous message: Mark Madsen: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Maybe in reply to: Leslie Daigle: "URI Revised charter proposal"
- Next in thread: Chris Weider: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"

    From: jul@oclc.org (Erik Jul)

    Date: Thu, 6 Jul 1995 13:55:47 -0400

    Message-Id: <199507061755.NAA01936@ws20-02.dev.oclc.org>

    To: uri@bunyip.com

    Subject: Re: URI Revised charter proposal

>
> Hmmm. I really think that we should have a standard for URCs,

A useful, limited, and measurable task for the WG to charter may be to
identify and list existing standards for recording or encoding metadata,
their respective standards bodies, the audiences they serve, the systems
that support them, and other data as deemed useful and appropriate.

Producing such a cogent document will lay a needed, solid foundation.

I propose this as a task for the URI WG to be expressed in the charter.

I would think this could be substantially accomplished within four months.

--Erik

Erik Jul
jul@oclc.org

- Next message: Karen R. Sollins: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Previous message: Mark Madsen: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Maybe in reply to: Leslie Daigle: "URI Revised charter proposal"
- Next in thread: Chris Weider: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"