# Re: Library Standards and URIs

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Thu, 5 Jan 1995 11:11:57 PST

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Ned Freed: "Re: Predraft of a new URL scheme: mailmsg"
- Previous message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: Library Standards and URIs"

    To: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov

    In-Reply-To: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov's message of Thu, 5 Jan 1995 11:01:34 -0800 <95Jan5.110146pst.2764@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Subject: Re: Library Standards and URIs

    From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>

    Message-Id: <95Jan5.111206pst.2760@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Date: Thu, 5 Jan 1995 11:11:57 PST

> Anyone out there want to kick the strawman or spring to its defense?

I like it. I'm thinking that you might not actually _need_ to
construct the DTD, but that it is important that you _could_. It's
also important that you be able to parse the URC simply without using
a full SGML interpreter. (I think there were similar design
requirements for HTML.)

- Next message: Ned Freed: "Re: Predraft of a new URL scheme: mailmsg"
- Previous message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: Library Standards and URIs"