# Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational

pays@faugeres.inria.fr
23 Sep 94 08:37:45+0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Re: Meta info tags"
- Previous message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"
- Maybe in reply to: IESG Secretary: "Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"
- Next in thread: Norbert Leser - OSF DCE:: "Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"

    Date: 23 Sep 94 08:37:45+0200

    From: pays@faugeres.inria.fr

    To: nl@osf.org, ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu

    Subject: Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational

    Message-Id: <780302265.24585.0-faugeres.inria.fr*@MHS>

1. Is IETF an open body which priamary goal is to collect all users
requirements and produce open standards OR is it intended to be
vehicle to back "closed groups" and or vendors interest?

2. OSF request is not to be taken into account until
- their specification is freely available on the net
- they accept discussion and are ALSO committing to possibly
revise their specification in the light of these open
discussions.
Full Stop!

-- PAP

I have some sympathy with xfn, but I suggest to stop any debate around
xfn until they comply to point 2 above.
If they stand on their position, I suggest to broadcast widely the message
that OSF is a war machine against users, and to propose to organize
a boycot of OSF technologies when they don't suit user needs. And we users
will decide what suits us and what not.

- Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Re: Meta info tags"
- Previous message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"
- Maybe in reply to: IESG Secretary: "Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"
- Next in thread: Norbert Leser - OSF DCE:: "Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"