# Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995

Jim Conklin (conklin@info.cren.net)
Fri, 4 Aug 1995 13:03:04 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Mark Madsen: "Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"
- Previous message: Jim Conklin: "Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"
- Maybe in reply to: Jim Conklin: "Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"
- Next in thread: Mark Madsen: "Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"
- Reply: Mark Madsen: "Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"

    Message-Id: <199508041700.NAA08824@info.cren.net>

    Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 13:03:04 +0100

    To: Mark Madsen <msm@ansa.co.uk>

    From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin)

    Subject: Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995

At 9:44 AM 8/4/95 +0100, Mark Madsen wrote:
>Jim Conklin wrote:
> ...
>> a. WG action on the URN syntax drafts should be moved ahead and
>> accomplished by (1) an interim report comparing the various URN
>> proposals (based on work already distributed to the WG) and recommending
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Would somebody clarify for me whether this refers to the draft I
>circulated to the URI list the week before the Stockholm meeting? ...

Mark,
I believe that's the case, but I confess that my memory is now fuzzy.
With the close of the WG, this and all other continuing UR* work will now
have to proceed in one of the new UR* WG's resulting from the UR-NG BOF.

Jim

- Next message: Mark Madsen: "Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"
- Previous message: Jim Conklin: "Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"
- Maybe in reply to: Jim Conklin: "Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"
- Next in thread: Mark Madsen: "Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"
- Reply: Mark Madsen: "Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995"