# Re: Minor clarification on url: prefix

Randy Bush (randy@psg.com)
Thu, 2 Dec 1993 09:35:01 -0800 (PST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: Minor clarification on url: prefix"
- Previous message: Simon E Spero: "Re: Minor clarification on url: prefix"
- In reply to: Tim Berners-Lee: "Minor clarification on url: prefix"
- Next in thread: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: Minor clarification on url: prefix"

    Message-Id: <m0p5Hvh-00030AC@rip.psg.com>

    From: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush)

    Subject: Re: Minor clarification on url: prefix

    To: timbl@nxoc01.cern.ch

    Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1993 09:35:01 -0800 (PST)

    In-Reply-To: <9312021607.AA00832@www3.cern.ch> from "Tim Berners-Lee" at Dec 2, 93 05:07:09 pm

> How about suggesting that in an RFC822 header context
> that a specific header be used for URLs?
>
> Newsgroups: ietf.neverending.uri
> URL: ftp://myhost/dir/file
> Date: 1997 Mar 31 21:67
>
> but leave the URL syntax unencumbered.

Useless. The article is not a URL, part of its content may be. And there
may be multiple URLs within the content, each with some assocuiated context.

- Next message: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: Minor clarification on url: prefix"
- Previous message: Simon E Spero: "Re: Minor clarification on url: prefix"
- In reply to: Tim Berners-Lee: "Minor clarification on url: prefix"
- Next in thread: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: Minor clarification on url: prefix"