# Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )

Ronald E. Daniel (rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov)
Fri, 23 Jun 1995 10:25:07 -0600

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Ron Daniel Jr.: "FWD: SGML URC spec comments (1/4)"
- Previous message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"

    From: "Ronald E. Daniel" <rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov>

    Message-Id: <9506231025.ZM5407@idaknow.acl.lanl.gov>

    Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 10:25:07 -0600

    In-Reply-To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>

    To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov

    Subject: Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )

On Jun 22, 4:29pm, Larry Masinter wrote:

> I object to the phrase 'For the truely paranoid among us' ...

I have changed the sentence to:

For those with serious concerns about information security, digital
signature techniques could be used to ensure their veracity, as
outlined in earlier scenarios.

That is what will appear in the next submission of the Scenarios
draft.

    --
    Ron Daniel Jr.                email: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov
    Advanced Computing Lab        voice: (505) 665-0597
    MS B-287  TA-3  Bldg. 2011      fax: (505) 665-4939
    Los Alamos National Lab        http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rdaniel/
    Los Alamos, NM,  87545    tautology: "Conformity is very popular"

- Next message: Ron Daniel Jr.: "FWD: SGML URC spec comments (1/4)"
- Previous message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"