# Re: <URL:...> considered harmful

Daniel W. Connolly (connolly@hal.com)
Tue, 13 Sep 1994 10:20:00 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Chris Weider: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- Previous message: Marc VanHeyningen: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- In reply to: Owen Rees: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Steven D. Majewski: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"

    Message-Id: <9409131520.AA07312@austin2.hal.com>

    To: Owen Rees <rtor@ansa.co.uk>

    Subject: Re: <URL:...> considered harmful

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Sep 1994 12:43:23 -0000."

                 <9409131143.AA15208@plato.ansa.co.uk>

    Date: Tue, 13 Sep 1994 10:20:00 -0500

    From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>

In message <9409131143.AA15208@plato.ansa.co.uk>, Owen Rees writes:
[lots of good stuff]

Well there are some arguments that I had somehow missed before.
I suppose <URL:...> is no more or less evil than any other
delimiter scheme, and now I can see some tangible motivation
for it.

I wouldn't mind seeing some of that prose in the document itself, but...

Dan

- Next message: Chris Weider: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- Previous message: Marc VanHeyningen: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- In reply to: Owen Rees: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Steven D. Majewski: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"