# Re: Meta info tags

Michael Mealling (Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu)
Tue, 20 Sep 1994 12:18:30 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Michael Mealling: "Re: Meta info tags"
- Previous message: Nick Arnett: "Re: Meta info tags"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: Meta info tags"

    From: Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu (Michael Mealling)

    Message-Id: <199409201618.MAA23078@oit.gatech.edu>

    Subject: Re: Meta info tags

    To: masinter@parc.xerox.com (Larry Masinter)

    Date: Tue, 20 Sep 1994 12:18:30 -0400 (EDT)

    In-Reply-To: <94Sep19.185558pdt.2760@golden.parc.xerox.com> from "Larry Masinter" at Sep 19, 94 06:55:56 pm

Larry Masinter said this:
> > What's the intent for the relationship between URCs and HTML headers?
>
> I think the requirement section of draft-ietf-uri-urc-spec-00.txt
> needs to be elaborated in order to answer the question.

Is it appropriate that implementation issues like that go into the
requirments document? I would think that would be an implementation issue.
I may be wrong or atleast splitting very fine hairs....

> In particular, there seem to be requirements from IAFA, IIIR, Z39.50,
> HTML, WAIS, and a few other things.
>
> I'm wondering, by the way, whether there's a different representation
> for URC-as-specification ("a set of attributes that you might expect
> to find") vs URC-as-description ("what are the characteristics of this
> here document").

Can you ellaborate? I would expecta heck of a lot of things that would/could
be in both depending on what function the user is currently doing....

-MM

    --
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    <HR><A HREF="http://www.gatech.edu/michael.html">
    <ADDRESS>Michael Mealling</ADDRESS>
    <ADDRESS>michael.mealling@oit.gatech.edu</ADDRESS></A>

- Next message: Michael Mealling: "Re: Meta info tags"
- Previous message: Nick Arnett: "Re: Meta info tags"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: Meta info tags"