# Re: URI Revised charter proposal

Terry Allen (terry@ora.com)
Wed, 5 Jul 1995 20:05:59 -0700

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Patrik Faltstrom: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Previous message: Larry Masinter: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"

    From: "Terry Allen" <terry@ora.com>

    Message-Id: <9507052005.ZM663@dmg.west.ora.com>

    Date: Wed, 5 Jul 1995 20:05:59 -0700

    In-Reply-To: Leslie Daigle <leslie@bunyip.com>

    To: Leslie Daigle <leslie@bunyip.com>, uri@bunyip.com

    Subject: Re: URI Revised charter proposal

Leslie writes:
>However, it is premature to be nailing down URC standards before we
have the primitives sorted out.

As the metadata schemes recently advanced stipulate that it's not
possible to limit the kind of info that might be relevant, and that
any base items they might specify are omissible and repeatable
(and as that is in line with common sense about cataloguing), what
sorting out is there to do? Be specific, please.

Regards,

    --
    Terry Allen  (terry@ora.com)   O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
    Editor, Digital Media Group    101 Morris St.
    			       Sebastopol, Calif., 95472

    A Davenport Group sponsor.  For information on the Davenport
      Group see ftp://ftp.ora.com/pub/davenport/README.html
    	or  http://www.ora.com/davenport/README.html

- Next message: Patrik Faltstrom: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Previous message: Larry Masinter: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"