# Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational

Paul Rarey (Paul.Rarey@systems.dhl.com)
Thu, 22 Sep 1994 10:59:22 -0700

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Norbert Leser - OSF DCE:: "Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"
- Previous message: Karen R. Sollins: "Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"

    From: Paul Rarey <Paul.Rarey@systems.dhl.com>

    Message-Id: <9409221059.ZM19431@cowboy.systems.DHL.COM>

    Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 10:59:22 -0700

    In-Reply-To: "Karen R. Sollins" <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>

    To: "Karen R. Sollins" <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>,

    Subject: Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational

All....

On Sep 22, 8:56, Karen R. Sollins wrote:
> Subject: Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informati

}Yes, I asked the same question followed by one about why they hadn't
}bothered to join our group which is free and open to anyone who cares
}to join. There was no particular answer to the second other than
}something about that we should already have known about XFN. In
}response to the first Norbert reports that the XFN document is only
}available on paper from X/Open and only for a fee of $400 and is
}intentionally copyrighted to restrict duplication. It is not
}available on the net at all. Don't hold your breath for publicly
}available mail archives with that attitude toward the work.

If we are not able to "freely" obtain the XFN spec for review, could at least
the requirements it was developed to be shared? At least this may shed some
light into what is happening there.

    --

    Cheers!

    [ psr ]

- Next message: Norbert Leser - OSF DCE:: "Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"
- Previous message: Karen R. Sollins: "Re: Last Call: URL to Proposed and URN- and IRL-Reqs to Informational"