# Re: New URM paper with additions!

Mitra (mitra@path.net)
Fri, 22 Oct 1993 10:00:56 PST

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Emtage: "Draft Agenda"
- Previous message: Alan Emtage: "Current documents"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Mealling: "New URM paper with additions!"
- Next in thread: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: New URM paper with additions!"

    From: mitra@path.net (Mitra)

    Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1993 10:00:56 PST

    In-Reply-To:  hoymand@joe.uwex.edu (Dirk Herr-Hoyman)

    To: hoymand@joe.uwex.edu, ccoprmm@oit.gatech.edu

    Subject: Re: New URM paper with additions!

    Message-Id:  <9310221000.aa00664@pandora.sf.ca.us>

} At 4:51 PM 10/21/93 -0400, Michael Mealling wrote:
} >Mitra said this:
} >Modify that by saying that I have concerns about some meta-information
} >containing the 4 characters 'UR*:' that could happen to appear at the
} >beginning of a line. For example:
} >
} > URM:IAFA:en_US.iso88591
} > Author: John Doe
} > Title: "My Book"
} > Format: application/postscript
} > Abstract: This is a book on
} > URM: type things where I think I just broke this URT becausee
} > my title has URM: in it.
} > URN:
} > URM:
} >
} >Where does that URM end in that URT?

If we are following the RFC822 rules as I suggested, then the errant
"URM:" would be indented by a tab to sow it was a continyation line
hence:

} > Format: application/postscript
} > Abstract: This is a book on
} > URM: type things where I think I just broke this URT becausee
} > my title has URM: in it.
} > URN:

- Mitra

- Next message: Alan Emtage: "Draft Agenda"
- Previous message: Alan Emtage: "Current documents"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Mealling: "New URM paper with additions!"
- Next in thread: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: New URM paper with additions!"