# Re: Registrar & URNs pointing to "current" documents

ist Administration (server@pandora.sf.ca.us)
Mon, 19 Jul 1993 12:16:23 PDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Mitra: "Re: URNs in the DNS"
- Previous message: Martin Hamilton: "whois++ // was -- Re: URNs in the DNS"

    From: server@pandora.sf.ca.us (ist Administration )

    Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1993 12:16:23 PDT

    In-Reply-To:  Rob Raisch <raisch@ora.com>

    To: raisch@ora.com, uri@bunyip.com, hoymand@joe.uwex.edu, WIGGINS@msu.edu

    Subject: Re: Registrar & URNs pointing to "current" documents

    Message-Id:  <9307191216.aa09726@pandora.sf.ca.us>

Rob -

I think its perfectly valid to have a pointer at a dynamic resource.
Instead of a different URN for it, I would argue this belongs
with types and variants and things in the meta
-information. e.g. Update-frequency=dynamic

- Mitra (sorry about the weird id on this message)

- Next message: Mitra: "Re: URNs in the DNS"
- Previous message: Martin Hamilton: "whois++ // was -- Re: URNs in the DNS"