# URL functional requirements doc (was Re: Changes to URL document)

John A. Kunze (jak@violet.berkeley.edu)
Fri, 18 Feb 1994 10:22:15 -0800

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alexander Dupuy: "Re: Finding URN->URL servers"
- Previous message: David Robison: "Re: Unresolvable URNs"
- Next in thread: Alan Emtage: "Re: URL functional requirements doc (was Re: Changes to URL document)"
- Maybe reply: Alan Emtage: "Re: URL functional requirements doc (was Re: Changes to URL document)"

    Date: Fri, 18 Feb 1994 10:22:15 -0800

    From: jak@violet.berkeley.edu (John A. Kunze)

    Message-Id: <199402181822.KAA11589@violet.berkeley.edu>

    To: bajan@bunyip.com, timbl@www0.cern.ch

    Subject: URL functional requirements doc (was Re: Changes to URL document)

> From: bajan@bunyip.com (Alan Emtage)
> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 18:28:55 -0500
> ...
> > Who is working on this draft? Karen and Larry are defiing URNs not URLs
> > or URIs. If I take out a definition of what the document is about,
> > I need something to refer to. I can refer to Karen and Larry's document
> > for the definition of a URN, and perhaps of a URL which they do
> > define in passing. But that document does not give requirements for URLs.
> > What can I quote here?
>
> John Kunze has a copy of the draft document that was presented at Houston
> and will be cleaning that up and posting it to the list.

Just for absolute clarity, this is the document that Jim presented in
session 2. It bears no relation to the Sunday discussion dump that I
presented in session 1, which was somewhat more contentious.

-John

- Next message: Alexander Dupuy: "Re: Finding URN->URL servers"
- Previous message: David Robison: "Re: Unresolvable URNs"
- Next in thread: Alan Emtage: "Re: URL functional requirements doc (was Re: Changes to URL document)"
- Maybe reply: Alan Emtage: "Re: URL functional requirements doc (was Re: Changes to URL document)"