# Re: UR Accessors

Rich Salz (rsalz@osf.org)
Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:01:09 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Michael Mealling: "Question for DNS propronents?"
- Previous message: Keith Moore: "Re: UR Accessors"
- Maybe in reply to: Daniel LaLiberte: "UR Accessors"
- Next in thread: Eric Miller: "Re: UR Accessors"
- Reply: Eric Miller: "Re: UR Accessors"
- Reply: Pierre Desjardins: "Re: UR Accessors"

    From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>

    Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:01:09 -0400

    Message-Id: <9506141701.AA12827@sulphur.osf.org>

    To: liberte@ncsa.uiuc.edu, uri@bunyip.com

    Subject: Re: UR Accessors

> In the path scheme, we (Michael Shapiro and I) came up with the idea
> of folding a fallback system into the path resolution process ...

I think it would be a good idea if a majority of those people
inventing UR[ACIN] systems would look at the X/Open Federated Naming
work. It includes many of the concepts and constructs people are
grasping for, and you'll probably start to see it bundled in O.S.
shipments within 12 months.

Unfortunately, I don't have a pointer other then "X/Open" as to where
to get the docs, nor the time/expertise to post a worthwhile synopsis
to this list.
/r$

- Next message: Michael Mealling: "Question for DNS propronents?"
- Previous message: Keith Moore: "Re: UR Accessors"
- Maybe in reply to: Daniel LaLiberte: "UR Accessors"
- Next in thread: Eric Miller: "Re: UR Accessors"
- Reply: Eric Miller: "Re: UR Accessors"
- Reply: Pierre Desjardins: "Re: UR Accessors"