# Re: The <URL: Wrapper take 2

Steven J. Richardson (sjr@merit.edu)
Thu, 15 Sep 1994 16:16:40 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Michael Mealling: "Re: The <URL: Wrapper take 2"
- Previous message: Larry Masinter: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- In reply to: Sally Hambridge: "The <URL: Wrapper take 2"

    Message-Id: <199409152016.QAA27993@merit.edu>

    To: sallyh@ludwig.intel.com (Sally Hambridge)

    Subject: Re: The <URL: Wrapper take 2

    In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 15 Sep 1994 10:53:54 PDT.

                 <9409151753.AA04848@Ludwig.intel.com>

    Date: Thu, 15 Sep 1994 16:16:40 -0400

    From: "Steven J. Richardson" <sjr@merit.edu>

I agree.

> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 94 10:53:54 PDT
> From: sallyh@Ludwig.intel.com (Sally Hambridge)
> To: uri@bunyip.com

> Hey - I usually lurk - but I *REALLY* thought we settled this
> in TO - by moving URL: into the wrapper and putting the wrapper
> in the appendix (if that isn't recursive, somehow).
>
> I'm with Chris - leave it as is and get on with it.
>
> Sally
> sallyh@ludwig.intel.com

- Next message: Michael Mealling: "Re: The <URL: Wrapper take 2"
- Previous message: Larry Masinter: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- In reply to: Sally Hambridge: "The <URL: Wrapper take 2"