# Re: URN - latest version

Mitra (mitra@path.net)
Tue, 18 Oct 94 17:51:32 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Karen R. Sollins: "got lost somewhere"
- Previous message: Mitra: "Re: URN - latest version"
- Maybe in reply to: Mitra: "URN - latest version"
- Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Current URN syntax is unacceptable"

    Date: Tue, 18 Oct 94 17:51:32 -0400

    Message-Id: <aac9ab8004021004afba@[198.133.26.187]>

    To: Chris Weider <clw@mocha.bunyip.com>

    From: mitra@path.net (Mitra)

    Subject: Re: URN - latest version

Oops - I already did (I asked at IAB and thought consensus was submit URN,
hold IIIA). I anticipate submitting a revised version immediately before
San Jose.

We can probably pull it if we email Joyce immediately. Please do this if
you think I've misinterpreted the consensus.

- Mitra

At 6:49 PM 10/18/94, Chris Weider wrote:
>Hi Jill:
> Mitra, Micheal Mealling, Cliff Newman and I all collaborated on the
>URN doc Mitra put up; I'm considering it a replacement for my Names
>document, but we probably won't submit this one for ID until just before
>the IETF.
>Chris
>
>

=======================================================================
Mitra mitra@path.net
Internet Consulting (415)488-0944
<http://www.path.net/mitra> fax (415)488-0988

- Next message: Karen R. Sollins: "got lost somewhere"
- Previous message: Mitra: "Re: URN - latest version"
- Maybe in reply to: Mitra: "URN - latest version"
- Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Current URN syntax is unacceptable"