# Re: URN syntax

Peter Deutsch (peterd@bunyip.com)
Wed, 27 Apr 1994 20:03:10 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: URN syntax"
- Previous message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: Selecting URL from "equal" sites"
- Maybe in reply to: Mitra: "URN syntax"
- Next in thread: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: URN syntax"

    Message-Id: <9404280003.AA11200@expresso.bunyip.com>

    From: Peter Deutsch <peterd@bunyip.com>

    Date: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 20:03:10 -0400

    In-Reply-To: Mitra's message as of Apr 27, 16:19

    To: mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us (Mitra), <uri@bunyip.com>

    Subject: Re: URN syntax

[ You wrote: ]

> Just for the record - as one of the people who proposed that the URN
> format should be hierarchical with NO seperation between
> publisher/naming authority and opaque string, I have been convinced by
> PeterD of the error-of-my-ways, and now think only that the
> publisher-i/naming-authority field should be hierarchical, so formats
> along the lines of.
>
> urn:collins/uk:12345

So does anyone else want to discuss this, hmmm? <taptaptap> ;-)

Seriously, we had a pretty good couple of days discussing
various topics in Minneapolis last week and he in turn
convinced me of the error-of-my-ways for a couple of things
I'd wanted done differently in Gopher's new IIF image format. I
think it shows the power of good beer in large quantities... :-)

- peterd

    --
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       "What do thay got, a whole lot of sand? We got a hot crustacean band!
            Each little clam here, know how to jam here! Under the Sea!"
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

- Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: URN syntax"
- Previous message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: Selecting URL from "equal" sites"
- Maybe in reply to: Mitra: "URN syntax"
- Next in thread: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: URN syntax"