# Re: URA headsup

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Wed, 31 May 1995 20:38:52 PDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Jon Knight: "Re: URA headsup"
- Previous message: Leslie Daigle: "URA headsup"
- In reply to: Leslie Daigle: "URA headsup"
- Next in thread: Jon Knight: "Re: URA headsup"
- Reply: Jon Knight: "Re: URA headsup"

    To: leslie@beethoven.bunyip.com

    In-Reply-To: Leslie Daigle's message of Wed, 31 May 1995 20:25:54 -0700 <9506010325.AA05726@beethoven.bunyip.com>

    Subject: Re: URA headsup

    From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>

    Message-Id: <95May31.203903pdt.2761@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 20:38:52 PDT

> As author of the paper on it, let me jump in... It was not _my_ impression
> after the last IETF meeting that we at Bunyip were the only people who
> saw the URA work as more than "extended-URLs-with-lots-of-features".

I'd like to hear from other WG members on this. I don't think that's
an unreasonable request.

- Next message: Jon Knight: "Re: URA headsup"
- Previous message: Leslie Daigle: "URA headsup"
- In reply to: Leslie Daigle: "URA headsup"
- Next in thread: Jon Knight: "Re: URA headsup"
- Reply: Jon Knight: "Re: URA headsup"