# Re: URN definition -- a way out?

Mitra (mitra@path.net)
Mon, 25 Oct 1993 13:24:03 PDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Fred Swartz: "Re: what good is a URL without type information?"
- Previous message: John A. Kunze: "Re: what good is a URL without type information?"

    From: mitra@path.net (Mitra)

    Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1993 13:24:03 PDT

    In-Reply-To:  "Fred Swartz" <fred.swartz@umich.edu>

    To: fred.swartz@umich.edu

    Subject: Re: URN definition -- a way out?

    Message-Id:  <9310251324.aa22859@pandora.sf.ca.us>

Personally I see URN->URL mapping as being a subset of URN->URC
mapping, and should therefore be in the same potocol, and offered
by the same servers. I can think of at least a dozen
ways to do this, and am inclined to go for any simple protocol
that someone is offering code for, I'd hate a dozen of
us to have to write it seperately and then hope they interoperate.

- Mitra

- Next message: Fred Swartz: "Re: what good is a URL without type information?"
- Previous message: John A. Kunze: "Re: what good is a URL without type information?"