# Comment on draft...

Rich Salz (rsalz@osf.org)
Wed, 7 Jun 1995 12:41:40 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Ron Daniel Jr.: "warning: first draft of new URC spec"
- Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: OCLC's URN Services Proposal"

    From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>

    Date: Wed, 7 Jun 1995 12:41:40 -0400

    Message-Id: <9506071641.AA00372@sulphur.osf.org>

    To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu

    Subject: Comment on draft...

> > I think that the stance of the draft, is to specify what an ideal
> > implementation should be. That doesn't mean that all implementations, in all
> > modes of operation, should follow exactly what thee draft says.

The IETF has standardized meanings for "must", "should", and "may".
The draft should use those terms precisely.
/r$

- Next message: Ron Daniel Jr.: "warning: first draft of new URC spec"
- Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: OCLC's URN Services Proposal"