# Re: URN: wrapper

Simon E Spero (ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu)
Wed, 20 Oct 93 23:51:27 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: John Curran: "Approx. discussion status (was: Re: URN: wrapper)"
- Previous message: Bob Deen: "Re: Revision of Chris & Peter's URN paper"
- Next in thread: John Curran: "Approx. discussion status (was: Re: URN: wrapper)"
- Reply: John Curran: "Approx. discussion status (was: Re: URN: wrapper)"

    Message-Id: <9310210351.AA22893@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

    To: eostrom@gac.edu (Erik Ostrom)

    Subject: Re: URN: wrapper

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Oct 93 19:40:12 CDT."

                 <9310210040.AA14995@gac.edu>

    Date: Wed, 20 Oct 93 23:51:27 -0400

    From: Simon E Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

With regards to the URL: wrapper - it seems that I may have gotten the
wrong end of the stick from Kevin's original message. Having spoken to Jim,
I now understand that Kevin was not suggesting changing the syntax of the URL
itself, and merely talking about a different syntax for the plain text wrapper.
There are absolutely no plans to make anything other than minor editorial
changes- thus URLs should be polished off pretty quickly. Stand down to
MOPP level 1; you may remove your masks.

Simon

- Next message: John Curran: "Approx. discussion status (was: Re: URN: wrapper)"
- Previous message: Bob Deen: "Re: Revision of Chris & Peter's URN paper"
- Next in thread: John Curran: "Approx. discussion status (was: Re: URN: wrapper)"
- Reply: John Curran: "Approx. discussion status (was: Re: URN: wrapper)"