# Re: URN namespace

Michael Mealling (Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu)
Thu, 17 Aug 1995 14:28:38 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Ruediger Volk: "Re: URN namespace"
- Previous message: Reed Wade: "Re: URN namespace"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: URN namespace"
- Next in thread: Ruediger Volk: "Re: URN namespace"
- Reply: Ruediger Volk: "Re: URN namespace"

    From: Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu (Michael Mealling)

    Message-Id: <199508171828.OAA01881@oit.gatech.edu>

    Subject: Re: URN namespace

    To: masinter@parc.xerox.com (Larry Masinter)

    Date: Thu, 17 Aug 1995 14:28:38 -0400 (EDT)

    In-Reply-To: <95Aug17.105533pdt.2763@golden.parc.xerox.com> from "Larry Masinter" at Aug 17, 95 10:55:21 am

Larry Masinter said this:
> Quick, somebody grab 'urn.int'. I don't think you need a _new_ top
> level domain, do you?

After an epiphany with Chris it appears that the only advantage to having
a new top level domain is that the urn namespace doesn't use the same
roots as the rest of DNS. But this is specious at best so I let it
drop....

-MM

    --
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Life is a game. Someone wins and someone loses. Get used to it.
    <BR>
    <HR><A HREF="http://www.gatech.edu/michael.html">Michael Mealling</A>

- Next message: Ruediger Volk: "Re: URN namespace"
- Previous message: Reed Wade: "Re: URN namespace"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: URN namespace"
- Next in thread: Ruediger Volk: "Re: URN namespace"
- Reply: Ruediger Volk: "Re: URN namespace"