# Re: <URL:...> considered harmful

Andrew Pam (avatar@jolt.mpx.com.au)
Tue, 13 Sep 1994 15:17:22 +1000 (EST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- Previous message: John A. Kunze: "latest draft of IRL Requirments document (long)"
- In reply to: Daniel W. Connolly: "<URL:...> considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Michael Mealling: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- Reply: Michael Mealling: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"

    Message-Id: <m0qkQF8-0005tXC@jolt.mpx.com.au>

    From: avatar@jolt.mpx.com.au (Andrew Pam)

    Subject: Re: <URL:...> considered harmful

    To: connolly@hal.com (Daniel W. Connolly)

    Date: Tue, 13 Sep 1994 15:17:22 +1000 (EST)

    In-Reply-To: <9409122013.AA02543@ulua.hal.com> from "Daniel W. Connolly" at Sep 12, 94 03:13:27 pm

> OK... we're at the "last call" stage, and this <URL:...> silliness is
> still in there. I thought it would die of its own weight, but
> alas... So I'll go to bat one last time:

I support Daniel's objections to the <URL:...> syntax.

Cheers,
*** AVATAR ***

    --
    Andrew Pam                                      avatar@aus.xanadu.com
    Manager, Serious Cybernetics                    avatar@jolt.mpx.com.au
    Coordinator, Xanadu Australia                   <http://www.aus.xanadu.com/>
    P.O. Box 409, Canterbury VIC 3126 Australia     gopher gopher.aus.xanadu.com

- Next message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- Previous message: John A. Kunze: "latest draft of IRL Requirments document (long)"
- In reply to: Daniel W. Connolly: "<URL:...> considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Michael Mealling: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"
- Reply: Michael Mealling: "Re: <URL:...> considered harmful"