# Re: questions on URL draft

Margaret St. Pierre (saint@wais.com)
Thu, 14 Jul 94 06:49:40 PDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: pays@faugeres.inria.fr: "Re: New URC Specification is ready...."
- Previous message: Mitra: "Re: questions on URL draft"
- Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "questions on URL draft"
- Next in thread: John Curran: "Re: questions on URL draft"

    Date: Thu, 14 Jul 94 06:49:40 PDT

    Message-Id: <9407141349.AA29064@wais.wais.com>

    To: Mitra <mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us>, uri@bunyip.com

    From: saint@wais.com (Margaret St. Pierre)

    Subject: Re: questions on URL draft

At 5:24 PM 7/12/94 -0700, Mitra wrote:
>>3. Remove `wais:' scheme from this draft. [not well enough defined?]
>unacceptable - but I could be convinced otherwise, I thought it was well
>defined - we received a definition from everyone involved I though?

I would prefer not to remove wais URLs. In new implementations of wais
based on Z39.50 V2 and/or V3, there is a place in the protocol for URLs.

Margaret

- Next message: pays@faugeres.inria.fr: "Re: New URC Specification is ready...."
- Previous message: Mitra: "Re: questions on URL draft"
- Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "questions on URL draft"
- Next in thread: John Curran: "Re: questions on URL draft"