# Re: Registrar

JWilliams.SBD-E@rx.xerox.com
Thu, 15 Jul 1993 02:54:57 PDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Registrar"
- Previous message: Martin Hamilton: "Re: URNs in the DNS"

    Date: 	Thu, 15 Jul 1993 02:54:57 PDT

    From: JWilliams.SBD-E@rx.xerox.com

    Subject: Re: Registrar

    In-Reply-To: "uri-request%mocha.bunyip:com:Xerox's message of 14 Jul 93 21:08:41 +0100 (Wednesday)"

    To: raisch@ora.com, krol@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu

    Message-Id: <"15-Jul-93 10:54:57 +1".*.John_G._Williams.sbd-e@rx.Xerox.com>

Rob et al,
whilst the scheme you outline (concatentating a mutable name with a version
number) works in select cases, I can think of situations where it doesnt work
so well.

If for example the URN is derived from a high precision digital signature
algorithm then that URN has no mutable info at all.

-- Jock Williams --

- Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Registrar"
- Previous message: Martin Hamilton: "Re: URNs in the DNS"