# Re: whither URI

Jim Conklin (conklin@info.cren.net)
Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:59:26 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Paul Hoffman: "More comments on the mailserver URL scheme"
- Previous message: Leslie Daigle: "Re: whither URI"

    Message-Id: <199506221557.LAA12221@info.cren.net>

    Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:59:26 -0500

    To: Leslie Daigle <leslie@beethoven.bunyip.com>, masinter@parc.xerox.com,

    From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin)

    Subject: Re: whither URI

I think Leslie is right about the need to keep close and careful
coordination between the groups working on the addressing, resolution,
metadata of UR's (and I might add architecture, since I have this feeling
that an architecture is what we're somewhat unsuccessfully working around),
and that they need to proceed in parallel, not serially in order to have
that coordination.
I am concerned about overload, though, which I believe is what motivated
Larry's and Keith's comments.

Jim

At 10:08 AM 6/22/95 -0400, Leslie Daigle wrote:
>I disagree that these things should be done serially, and I am not suggesting
>that they should all be done in one working group. ...
>
>What I have said is the that the URI group should continue to consider some
>metadata issues, at the level of architecting resource location/discovery
>tools.
> ..
>On the other hand, with a certain amount of vision, we can do more than
>just stack engineering hack upon engineering hack.
>
>Leslie.

- Next message: Paul Hoffman: "More comments on the mailserver URL scheme"
- Previous message: Leslie Daigle: "Re: whither URI"