# Re: caching

Keith Moore (moore@cs.utk.edu)
Wed, 16 Feb 1994 17:24:25 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Michael Mealling: "Re: caching"
- Previous message: Randy Bush: "Re: caching"
- In reply to: Michael Mealling: "Re: caching"
- Next in thread: Keith Moore: "Re: caching"

    Message-Id: <199402162224.RAA10226@wilma.cs.utk.edu>

    From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>

    To: ccoprmm@oit.gatech.edu (Michael Mealling)

    Subject: Re: caching

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 16 Feb 1994 13:37:31 EST."

                 <199402161837.AA10452@oit.gatech.edu>

    Date: Wed, 16 Feb 1994 17:24:25 -0500

> Caching (which I take it means time to live and other such stuff) should be
> outside the URL/N and in the URC which is where all that meta-info should
> go anyway.

Which meta-info? The meta-info that's specific to a concept that can be
embodied in one or more bit sequences (say with different content-types), or
the meta-info that's specific to a particular one of those bit sequences, or
the meta-info that's specific to a particular location of a particular file?

(I don't think they all belong in the same place...)

Actually, I'd probably agree with you that the TTL etc doesn't go in the URN.

But there's a danger in specifying the URN without specifying anything about
expectations of how it's to be used...

Keith

- Next message: Michael Mealling: "Re: caching"
- Previous message: Randy Bush: "Re: caching"
- In reply to: Michael Mealling: "Re: caching"
- Next in thread: Keith Moore: "Re: caching"