# Re: urn:publisher.com:0010929292

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Sun, 17 Oct 1993 12:03:44 PDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Kevin Altis: "Re: The URN: wrapper and URLs (correction)"
- Previous message: Terry Allen: "Re: <'s for URLs"
- Next in thread: Rob Raisch, The Internet Company: "Re: urn:publisher.com:0010929292"
- Reply: Rob Raisch, The Internet Company: "Re: urn:publisher.com:0010929292"

    To: uri@bunyip.com

    In-Reply-To: "Rob Raisch, The Internet Company"'s message of Sun, 17 Oct 1993 08:25:11 -0700 <Pine.3.03.9310170810.B17025-a100000@hmmm.internet.com>

    Subject: Re: urn:publisher.com:0010929292

    From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>

    Message-Id: <93Oct17.120346pdt.2794@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Date: 	Sun, 17 Oct 1993 12:03:44 PDT

It had been my impression that one of the design requirements for URNs
was that that names of objects have to be PERMANENT -- that you can
make a reference in one document to another document that will
`stick', and not change even though the second document moves, its'
publisher goes out of business or whatever.

Perhaps I misunderstood? This hasn't been in the list of requirements
or differences between URNs and URLs that have been discussed so far.

- Next message: Kevin Altis: "Re: The URN: wrapper and URLs (correction)"
- Previous message: Terry Allen: "Re: <'s for URLs"
- Next in thread: Rob Raisch, The Internet Company: "Re: urn:publisher.com:0010929292"
- Reply: Rob Raisch, The Internet Company: "Re: urn:publisher.com:0010929292"