# Re: URN syntax

Tim Berners-Lee (timbl@ptpc00.cern.ch)
Thu, 28 Apr 94 09:58:20 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: URN syntax"
- Previous message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: URN syntax"
- Maybe in reply to: Mitra: "URN syntax"
- Next in thread: Mitra: "Re: URN syntax"
- Reply: Mitra: "Re: URN syntax"

    Date: Thu, 28 Apr 94 09:58:20 +0200

    From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@ptpc00.cern.ch>

    Message-Id: <9404280758.AA01708@ptpc00.cern.ch>

    To: mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us (Mitra)

    Subject: Re: URN syntax

> Just for the record - as one of the people who proposed that the URN
> format should be hierarchical with NO seperation between
> publisher/naming authority and opaque string, I have been convinced by
> PeterD of the error-of-my-ways, and now think only that the
> publisher-i/naming-authority field should be hierarchical, so formats
> along the lines of.

What was Peter's argument? Maybe he can convince me too.

Tim

- Next message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: URN syntax"
- Previous message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: URN syntax"
- Maybe in reply to: Mitra: "URN syntax"
- Next in thread: Mitra: "Re: URN syntax"
- Reply: Mitra: "Re: URN syntax"