# Re: LISP for Complex URC Sytax [WAS: Re URC func spec ]

Simon E Spero (ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu)
Wed, 23 Mar 94 20:32:16 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "URL: Outstanding issues"
- Previous message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: LISP for Complex URC Sytax [WAS: Re URC func spec ]"
- In reply to: Daniel W. Connolly: "LISP for Complex URC Sytax [WAS: Re URC func spec ]"
- Next in thread: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: LISP for Complex URC Sytax [WAS: Re URC func spec ]"

    Message-Id: <9403240132.AA11113@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

    To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>

    Subject: Re: LISP for Complex URC Sytax [WAS: Re URC func spec ]

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Mar 94 10:46:52 CST."

                 <9403231646.AA01231@ulua.hal.com>

    Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 20:32:16 -0500

    From: Simon E Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Using a lisp syntax is a great idea (hell, my next home system is going to be
a symbolics 3645); however it might be more appropriate to use SGML to
do structured text. If you compare the number of HTML pages out there with
the number of completed IAFA templates, it's clear that using RFC822 style
layout isn't always a big win.

- Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "URL: Outstanding issues"
- Previous message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: LISP for Complex URC Sytax [WAS: Re URC func spec ]"
- In reply to: Daniel W. Connolly: "LISP for Complex URC Sytax [WAS: Re URC func spec ]"
- Next in thread: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: LISP for Complex URC Sytax [WAS: Re URC func spec ]"