# Re: the URL document

Erik Huizer (Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl)
Mon, 20 Jun 1994 13:59:56 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Emtage: "Call for "topics""
- Previous message: Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US: "I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-uri-irl-fun-req-00.txt"
- In reply to: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"
- Next in thread: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"

    To: bajan@bunyip.com (Alan Emtage)

    Subject: Re: the URL document

    In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 14 Jun 1994 22:44:52 -0400. <9406150244.AA08211@mocha.bunyip.com>

    Date: Mon, 20 Jun 1994 13:59:56 +0200

    From: "Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)" <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>

    Message-Id: <"survis.sur.158:20.05.94.11.59.59"@surfnet.nl>

==> From: Alan Emtage

> Correct. The requirements doc was in the hands of John Kunze. At the last
> meeting it was approved and I believe that at this point it just needs to
> be submitted to the Chair and we can send it up the line. Its an
> information RFC so we don't have to go through all the standards track
> stuff.

To set things straight. All output from a WG goes thru the IESG for review,
regardless of whther it is standards track or not. It is just that standards
track stuff gats more attention. However I want a last call on things this
important. I am currently holding up the URN requirements doc to be able to
do the last call together with the IRL requirements doc and the URL spec.
This is better IMO, as it gives non-WG participants a better view of how
things fit together.

Procedural: When a paper has concensus in the WG, the final version gets
published as I-D again, and then the WG-chairs send a note to the
iesg-secretary with cc to the ADs that the I-D so and so is submitted for
consideration for publication as Informational/standards/experimental RFC.

Erik

- Next message: Alan Emtage: "Call for "topics""
- Previous message: Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US: "I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-uri-irl-fun-req-00.txt"
- In reply to: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"
- Next in thread: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"