# Re: URI Revised charter proposal

Chris Weider (clw@bunyip.com)
Fri, 7 Jul 1995 10:48:10 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Chris Weider: "Re: Whither URI: Revising the charter, disband URI?"
- Previous message: Chris Weider: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"
- Maybe in reply to: Leslie Daigle: "URI Revised charter proposal"
- Next in thread: Erik Jul: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"

    From: Chris Weider <clw@bunyip.com>

    Date: Fri, 7 Jul 1995 10:48:10 -0400

    Message-Id: <199507071448.KAA02012@kosh.bunyip.com>

    To: leslie@bunyip.com, terry@ora.com, uri@bunyip.com

    Subject: Re: URI Revised charter proposal

Hi Terry:

>
>Leslie writes:
>>However, it is premature to be nailing down URC standards before we
>have the primitives sorted out.
>
>As the metadata schemes recently advanced stipulate that it's not
>possible to limit the kind of info that might be relevant, and that
>any base items they might specify are omissible and repeatable
>(and as that is in line with common sense about cataloguing), what
>sorting out is there to do? Be specific, please.
>

I think that if we can split the URC discussions into the groups I
mentioned earlier (basic functionality, transfer syntax, and schema)
we might be able to make more progress.
Chris

- Next message: Chris Weider: "Re: Whither URI: Revising the charter, disband URI?"
- Previous message: Chris Weider: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"
- Maybe in reply to: Leslie Daigle: "URI Revised charter proposal"
- Next in thread: Erik Jul: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"