# Re: URN: wrapper and URLs

Steven J. Richardson (sjr@merit.edu)
Tue, 19 Oct 1993 09:30:30 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: John A. Kunze: "FAQ? (was Johns list of points)"
- Previous message: Mitra: "Johns list of points"
- In reply to: Simon E Spero: "Re: URN: wrapper and URLs"
- Next in thread: Kevin Gamiel: "Re: URN: wrapper and URLs"

    Message-Id: <9310191330.AA23018@merit.edu>

    To: Simon E Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

    Subject: Re: URN: wrapper and URLs

    In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 18 Oct 1993 14:18:55 EDT.

                 <9310181818.AA14829@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

    Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1993 09:30:30 -0400

    From: "Steven J. Richardson" <sjr@merit.edu>

> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 93 14:18:55 -0400
> From: Simon E Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
> To: ccoprmm@oit.gatech.edu (Michael Mealling)
> CC: uri@bunyip.com

> A counter motion is not in order at this time because a motion is already
> before the meeting.
>
> Fortunately since what you proposed is basically identical to the motion
> that is before the meeting, it doesn't make much difference. :)
>
> To recap:
>
> URLs - no change
> URNs - look like URLs whose type selector is the string urn -
> i.e. urn:....
>
> Simon

Add a "Yes" vote.

Steve Richardson
Merit Network, Inc.

- Next message: John A. Kunze: "FAQ? (was Johns list of points)"
- Previous message: Mitra: "Johns list of points"
- In reply to: Simon E Spero: "Re: URN: wrapper and URLs"
- Next in thread: Kevin Gamiel: "Re: URN: wrapper and URLs"