# Re: no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?

Ronald E. Daniel (rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov)
Wed, 4 Oct 1995 15:52:11 -0600

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Daniel LaLiberte: "URC formats vs interfaces"
- Previous message: Larry Masinter: "no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?"

    From: "Ronald E. Daniel" <rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov>

    Message-Id: <9510041552.ZM971@whatthe.acl.lanl.gov>

    Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 15:52:11 -0600

    In-Reply-To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>

    To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, uri@bunyip.com

    Subject: Re: no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?

On Oct 4, 1:43pm, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Subject: no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?
> Discussion of charters & WG milestones seem to have died down, and no
> one has requested any WG or BOF slots....
>
> If maybe things are happening offline and you don't need to meet?

Sorry that I have not kept everyone informed on this. I have
submitted the URC-WG charter to John and Harald and am waiting to
hear from them on the status of the URC-WG. I have continued
to work on URCs, and have some stuff that I am about ready to
send to the URC list. People who want to see the rough notes
can take a look at http://www.acl.lanl.gov/URC/canonical.html

If the URC-WG charter is accepted, I would hope that we would meet
in Dallas to talk about the canonical representation and how it
does or doesn't meet the needs of the various protocols.

Regards,

    --
    Ron Daniel Jr.                email: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov
    Advanced Computing Lab        voice: (505) 665-0597
    MS B-287  TA-3  Bldg. 2011      fax: (505) 665-4939
    Los Alamos National Lab        http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rdaniel/
    Los Alamos, NM,  87545    tautology: "Conformity is very popular"

- Next message: Daniel LaLiberte: "URC formats vs interfaces"
- Previous message: Larry Masinter: "no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?"