# The <URL: Wrapper take 2

Sally Hambridge (sallyh@Ludwig.intel.com)
Thu, 15 Sep 94 10:53:54 PDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Chris Weider: "The <URL: Wrapper take 2"
- Previous message: Benedikt Homann: "Re: Relative URLs u. Lynx"
- Next in thread: Steven J. Richardson: "Re: The <URL: Wrapper take 2"
- Reply: Steven J. Richardson: "Re: The <URL: Wrapper take 2"

    Date: Thu, 15 Sep 94 10:53:54 PDT

    From: sallyh@Ludwig.intel.com (Sally Hambridge)

    Message-Id: <9409151753.AA04848@Ludwig.intel.com>

    To: uri@bunyip.com

    Subject: The <URL: Wrapper take 2

Hey - I usually lurk - but I *REALLY* thought we settled this
in TO - by moving URL: into the wrapper and putting the wrapper
in the appendix (if that isn't recursive, somehow).

I'm with Chris - leave it as is and get on with it.

Sally
sallyh@ludwig.intel.com

- Next message: Chris Weider: "The <URL: Wrapper take 2"
- Previous message: Benedikt Homann: "Re: Relative URLs u. Lynx"
- Next in thread: Steven J. Richardson: "Re: The <URL: Wrapper take 2"
- Reply: Steven J. Richardson: "Re: The <URL: Wrapper take 2"