# Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )

Kee Hinckley (nazgul@utopia.com)
Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:37:45 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: A Note on URC Querying"
- Previous message: Fisher Mark: "URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Maybe in reply to: Martijn Koster: "Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"
- Next in thread: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"
- Reply: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"

    Message-Id: <v02120d12ac0ca54ccfa4@[204.57.39.3]>

    Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:37:45 -0400

    To: lilley <lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk>

    From: nazgul@utopia.com (Kee Hinckley)

    Subject: Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )

At 3:41 PM 6/19/95, lilley wrote:
>Those influential (and monied) groups who care about such things can then
>finance the proxies and their URC resolvers to implement whatever type
>of cens^H^H^H^Hfiltering is desired.

A proxy based system really doesn't scale, money or no-money.

Kee Hinckley Utopia Inc. - Cyberspace Architects=81 617/721-6100
nazgul@utopia.com http://www.utopia.com/

I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.

- Next message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: A Note on URC Querying"
- Previous message: Fisher Mark: "URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Maybe in reply to: Martijn Koster: "Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"
- Next in thread: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"
- Reply: Stephen D. Williams: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"