# Re: Follow up on charter proposal

Martin Hamilton (martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk)
Sun, 09 Jul 1995 22:56:51 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Previous message: Daniel LaLiberte: "Re: draft-ietf-uri-urn-path-01.txt: performance estimates?"
- In reply to: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Next in thread: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"

    Message-Id: <199507092156.WAA21649@gizmo.lut.ac.uk>

    To: uri@bunyip.com

    Subject: Re: Follow up on charter proposal

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 08 Jul 1995 15:00:37 EDT."

                 <199507081900.PAA22070@wilma.cs.utk.edu>

    Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1995 22:56:51 +0100

    From: Martin Hamilton <martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk>

Keith Moore writes:

| The "URNs considered harmful" draft has a similar proposal, only
| it uses the domain from a URL as the "naming authority" for the
| DNS lookup.

The approach you suggest appeals greatly, though I think it would be
even nicer were there a way to get at least the catalog server's port
number and protocol name into the RCS records... :-)

Martin

- Next message: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Previous message: Daniel LaLiberte: "Re: draft-ietf-uri-urn-path-01.txt: performance estimates?"
- In reply to: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Next in thread: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
- Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"