# Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL

Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
Thu, 23 Nov 1995 13:54:15 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: William Perry: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- Previous message: Al Gilman: "Re: mid and cid URLs"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- Next in thread: Martin Hamilton: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- Reply: Martin Hamilton: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- Reply: Al Gilman: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"

    Message-Id: <199511231254.NAA03887@dale.uninett.no>

    From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no

    To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>

    Subject: Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Nov 1995 21:55:14 PST." <95Nov21.215529pst.2733@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 13:54:15 +0100

Note that any system which sends mail without a manual check first
is, IMHO, dangerous.
So I certainly hope implementors of both mailto: and mailserver: URLs
do this stuff carefully....

The discussion has at least proved (to me) that it would be a Good Thing
to have someone <volunteers queue to the left, please..> write up some
guidelines for how mailto: should be implemented.

Harald

- Next message: William Perry: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- Previous message: Al Gilman: "Re: mid and cid URLs"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- Next in thread: Martin Hamilton: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- Reply: Martin Hamilton: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- Reply: Al Gilman: "Re: mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"