# Re: options, not nesting?

Michael Mealling (ccoprmm@oit.gatech.edu)
Fri, 29 Oct 93 15:10:31 EDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: Thumbnail Sketch of the UR* Arena"
- Previous message: Mitra: "Re: Data elements and other jazz"
- In reply to: Peter Deutsch: "Re: options, not nesting?"
- Next in thread: Peter Deutsch: "Re: options, not nesting?"

    From: ccoprmm@oit.gatech.edu (Michael Mealling)

    Message-Id: <199310291910.AA21966@oit.oit.gatech.edu>

    Subject: Re: options, not nesting?

    To: peterd@bunyip.com (Peter Deutsch)

    Date: Fri, 29 Oct 93 15:10:31 EDT

    In-Reply-To: <9310291847.AA06043@expresso.bunyip.com>; from "Peter Deutsch" at Oct 29, 93 2:47 pm

Peter Deutsch said this:
>
> But then you'll have cases where your parse has to special
> case URIs, and tack on the attribute name, but strip it
> off for others. I'd say tokenize the LHS and ignore
> repetitions when they occur.

Good point.

> > but I can live with the URN:URN: version...
>
> I actually think it preferable.

So be it. Consenus reached withing this scope?

-MM

    --
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Michael Mealling                     ! Hypermedia WWW, WAIS, and gopher will be
    Georgia Institute of Technology      ! here soon via MIME. Your view of the
    Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu      ! internet is about to change completely!

- Next message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: Thumbnail Sketch of the UR* Arena"
- Previous message: Mitra: "Re: Data elements and other jazz"
- In reply to: Peter Deutsch: "Re: options, not nesting?"
- Next in thread: Peter Deutsch: "Re: options, not nesting?"