# Re: Question for DNS propronents?

Keith Moore (moore@cs.utk.edu)
Fri, 16 Jun 1995 10:21:40 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Terry Allen: "Re: Question for DNS propronents?"
- Previous message: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: new port for DNS"
- In reply to: Terry Allen: "Re: Question for DNS propronents?"

    Message-Id: <199506161421.KAA03183@wilma.cs.utk.edu>

    From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>

    To: "Terry Allen" <terry@ora.com>

    Subject: Re: Question for DNS propronents?

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Jun 1995 07:07:42 PDT."

                 <9506160707.ZM936@dmg.west.ora.com>

    Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 10:21:40 -0400

> No. URNs are going to be resolved in lots of ways over the next
> decade alone. Concentrate on getting a good URN design, then
> test resolution methods. If you have to agree on resolution before
> you can even create URNs, there won't be any.

If we can't agree on at least one resolution method to be widely
used, there won't be any meaningful criteria with which to
choose a URN scheme.

Keith

- Next message: Terry Allen: "Re: Question for DNS propronents?"
- Previous message: Dirk Herr-Hoyman: "Re: new port for DNS"
- In reply to: Terry Allen: "Re: Question for DNS propronents?"