# the URL document

Karen R. Sollins (sollins@lcs.mit.edu)
Sun, 12 Jun 94 19:48:06 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Dudu Rashty +972-2-584848: "Change of URL"
- Previous message: Larry Masinter: "comments on naming from Steve Strasen"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "the URL document"
- Next in thread: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"
- Maybe reply: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"
- Maybe reply: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"

    Date: Sun, 12 Jun 94 19:48:06 -0400

    Message-Id: <9406122348.AA19529@zippy.lcs.mit.edu>

    From: "Karen R. Sollins" <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>

    To: masinter@parc.xerox.com

    In-Reply-To: Larry Masinter's message of Wed, 8 Jun 1994 21:57:36 PDT <94Jun8.215750pdt.2760@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Subject: the URL document

Sounds to me like you should just procede ahead. I also am anxious to
see things completed at this point. Who is writing the URL
requirements document? What is it's state? Shouldn't that really
come first? My vague recollection is that it was essentially done at
some time that has faded into the misty past, at least for me. Or has
it faded so much from my mind that I've lost track of its completion?
Looking back at the proposed new charter for the URI WG, the URL
requirements doc (and standard) were to have been submitted in May.

By the way, while we're at it, could whoever is working on the URN
spec please send out a draft of its current state, so that we can get
that completed as well?
Karen

- Next message: Dudu Rashty +972-2-584848: "Change of URL"
- Previous message: Larry Masinter: "comments on naming from Steve Strasen"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "the URL document"
- Next in thread: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"
- Maybe reply: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"
- Maybe reply: Alan Emtage: "Re: the URL document"