# Re: CID: and MID: URL schemes

Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
Mon, 20 Nov 1995 21:29:26 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Al Gilman: "Re: mid and cid URLs"
- Previous message: Al Gilman: "mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- In reply to: Ed Levinson: "Re: CID: and MID: URL schemes"

    From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no

    Message-Id: <9511202030.AA23078@mocha.bunyip.com>

    To: Ed Levinson <elevinso@Accurate.COM>

    Subject: Re: CID: and MID: URL schemes

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 Nov 1995 11:05:48 EST." <9511021605.AA03874@Accurate.COM>

    Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 21:29:26 +0100

Ed,
one reason why cid and mid should be different is that you search
for one in content-id: fields and for the other in message-id: fields.

A client may be able to search for one and not the other.
And, as you say, we can't guarantee that the intersection set is empty.

Harald A

- Next message: Al Gilman: "Re: mid and cid URLs"
- Previous message: Al Gilman: "mailserver: vs. expanded mailto: URL"
- In reply to: Ed Levinson: "Re: CID: and MID: URL schemes"