# Re: URC spec

Michael Mealling (Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu)
Wed, 14 Jun 1995 17:53:58 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: William Y. Arms: "URNs, handles, and Stockholm"
- Previous message: Michael Mealling: "Re: Question for DNS propronents?"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: URC spec"

    From: Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu (Michael Mealling)

    Message-Id: <199506142153.RAA26219@oit.gatech.edu>

    Subject: Re: URC spec

    To: masinter@parc.xerox.com (Larry Masinter)

    Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 17:53:58 -0400 (EDT)

    In-Reply-To: <95Jun14.140911pdt.2761@golden.parc.xerox.com> from "Larry Masinter" at Jun 14, 95 02:09:01 pm

Larry Masinter said this:
> Names are names, and resolution is resolution. You can have a name,
> and in one scenario resolve it to a URL and in another resolve it to a
> URC.

and in one scenario have two or no methods of actual resolution. This is
why I say that syntax of the URN should have no bearing on how it is resolved.

I agree with Larry.....

-MM

    --
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Life is a game. Someone wins and someone loses. Get used to it.
    <BR>
    <HR><A HREF="http://www.gatech.edu/michael.html">Michael Mealling</A>

- Next message: William Y. Arms: "URNs, handles, and Stockholm"
- Previous message: Michael Mealling: "Re: Question for DNS propronents?"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: URC spec"