# Re: URN: wrapper and URLs

Simon E Spero (ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu)
Tue, 19 Oct 93 08:59:59 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Leslie Daigle: "forwarded message"
- Previous message: Marc Andreessen: "IETF work and UR*"
- In reply to: Kevin Gamiel: "Re: URN: wrapper and URLs"
- Next in thread: Erik Huizer: "IETF work and UR*"

    Message-Id: <9310191300.AA16355@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

    To: Kevin Gamiel <kgamiel@vinca.cnidr.org>

    Subject: Re: URN: wrapper and URLs

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Oct 93 01:29:45 EDT."

                 <Pine.3.05.9310190144.A11432-b100000@vinca.cnidr.org>

    Date: Tue, 19 Oct 93 08:59:59 -0400

    From: Simon E Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Kevin Gamiel <kgamiel@vinca.cnidr.org> writes:
>
>Ugly, but (argggg) understandable in context. Policy request! Policy
>Request! Is a vote by physical attendants to URI meeting in Houston all
>that is needed to nail down this issue one way or the other?

This raises a very important question of privilege affecting absentee
members. The bylaws would be the place to look this up.
Proxy voting through a neutral referee would be fair (is it tactful
to mention referees to someone from Georgia Tech after Saturday? :)
>
>> I don't know if that followed Roberts Rules or not. Sorry! ;-)

Since the question has still not been taken up by either of the mysterious
missing chairmen (strange how Jim goes to Canada and disappears:), the motion
is still mine, so I can incorporate some of your changes and then move
the composite. I'll do this later today.

>
>Simon? Rules? Gimme a break! :-)

Your plot to distract me by breaking will never work?
>Kevin

- Next message: Leslie Daigle: "forwarded message"
- Previous message: Marc Andreessen: "IETF work and UR*"
- In reply to: Kevin Gamiel: "Re: URN: wrapper and URLs"
- Next in thread: Erik Huizer: "IETF work and UR*"