# Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful

Jim Conklin (conklin@info.cren.net)
Fri, 7 Jul 1995 12:17:52 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Lorcan Dempsey: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"
- Previous message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"
- Maybe in reply to: Fisher Mark: "URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Next in thread: Fisher Mark: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"

    Message-Id: <199507071615.MAA28567@info.cren.net>

    Date: Fri, 7 Jul 1995 12:17:52 -0500

    To: "Ronald E. Daniel" <rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov>,

    From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin)

    Subject: Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful

At 8:43 AM 7/6/95 -0600, Ronald E. Daniel wrote:
> ...
>The draft URC spec provides a query to obtain all the URNs provided
>by a server. You would then have to do more work to get all the URCs.
> ...

I think this is the right way to handle it. However, I wonder if even
this may violate some privacy laws.

Jim

- Next message: Lorcan Dempsey: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"
- Previous message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"
- Maybe in reply to: Fisher Mark: "URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Next in thread: Fisher Mark: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"