# Re: Proposed change to URN Requirements document

rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov
Mon, 26 Sep 94 08:32:42 -0600

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Jon P. Knight: "URC vs IAFA Templates"
- Previous message: Mitra: "Re: Meta info tags"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Proposed change to URN Requirements document"

    Message-Id: <199409261432.IAA24449@idaknow.acl.lanl.gov>

    To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>

    Subject: Re: Proposed change to URN Requirements document

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Sep 94 14:34:10 PDT."

                 <94Sep23.143411pdt.2763@golden.parc.xerox.com>

    Date: Mon, 26 Sep 94 08:32:42 -0600

    From: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov

> As a way to resolve this issue, I would like to propose that we adopt
> this wording change.

I support the wording change. I believe that persistance and global scope
are the most important requirements for a URN. Legacy support is nice as
long as it doesn't conflict.

Ron Daniel

- Next message: Jon P. Knight: "URC vs IAFA Templates"
- Previous message: Mitra: "Re: Meta info tags"
- In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Proposed change to URN Requirements document"