# Re: <SIGH> (was: Re: date in URN)

Karen R. Sollins (sollins@lcs.mit.edu)
Mon, 26 Jun 1995 16:22:51 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Paul Grous: "Re: Agent-mediated access (was Re: Criticism of Kidcode...)"
- Previous message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"
- In reply to: Peter Deutsch: "<SIGH> (was: Re: date in URN)"

    Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 16:22:51 -0400

    Message-Id: <199506262022.QAA08244@lysithea.lcs.mit.edu>

    From: "Karen R. Sollins" <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>

    To: peterd@bunyip.com

    In-Reply-To: <9506251638.AA16802@expresso.bunyip.com> (message from Peter Deutsch on Sun, 25 Jun 1995 12:38:41 -0400)

    Subject: Re: <SIGH> (was: Re: date in URN)

Hi Peter,

'Tis many a slip, 'tween the cup and the lips...

[ I wrote: ]
. . .
} Depending upon how we do it, I think dereferencing does
} mean we need a human friendly part for when humans must
} select these things. For dereferencing, we obviously want
} to focus on the mechanical processing capabilities and
} might be willing to sacrifice readibility here if it makes
} it work.

I of course meant to say ""For **comparison**, we obviously want
to focuse on the mechanical processing capabilities..."

Sorry if this caused any confusion...

- peterd

Not a problem - actually, I also expect that most of the job of
dereferencing had better be mechanical too, so I had no problem with
your statement.
Karen

- Next message: Paul Grous: "Re: Agent-mediated access (was Re: Criticism of Kidcode...)"
- Previous message: Ronald E. Daniel: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"
- In reply to: Peter Deutsch: "<SIGH> (was: Re: date in URN)"