# Re: mailserver scheme, third round

Daniel W. Connolly (connolly@hal.com)
Mon, 16 Jan 1995 11:39:29 -0600

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: mailserver scheme, third round"
- Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: mailserver scheme, third round"
- In reply to: Paul Hoffman: "mailserver scheme, third round"
- Next in thread: Paul Hoffman: "Re: mailserver scheme, third round"

    Message-Id: <9501161739.AA15376@ulua.hal.com>

    To: ietf-lists@proper.com (Paul Hoffman)

    Subject: Re: mailserver scheme, third round

    In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 14 Jan 1995 20:46:28 PST."

                 <ab3e57c407021003efea@[165.227.40.13]>

    Date: Mon, 16 Jan 1995 11:39:29 -0600

    From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>

In message <ab3e57c407021003efea@[165.227.40.13]>, Paul Hoffman writes:
>
>The "mailserver" URL has the form:
>
> mailserver:<rfc822-addr-spec>/*[<header>/]/<body>

As long as we're not using the mailto: name, I suggest we use the
same name that the MIME spec gives to this functionality, i.e.
mail-server.

Wherever possible, I think the MIME external-body access type
namespace and the URI scheme namespace should coincide. It seems silly
to have different names for the same functionality -- or even worse --
different functionality by the same name.

Dan

- Next message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: mailserver scheme, third round"
- Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: mailserver scheme, third round"
- In reply to: Paul Hoffman: "mailserver scheme, third round"
- Next in thread: Paul Hoffman: "Re: mailserver scheme, third round"