# Re: no 'object architecture' in URI working group

Rich Salz (rsalz@osf.org)
Wed, 12 Jul 1995 10:35:57 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Mark Madsen: "Distributed Objects for Internet Architecture"
- Previous message: Leslie Daigle: "Re: URI Revised charter"
- Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "no 'object architecture' in URI working group"

    From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>

    Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 10:35:57 -0400

    Message-Id: <9507121435.AA06649@sulphur.osf.org>

    To: masinter@parc.xerox.com, owner-uri@bunyip.com

    Subject: Re: no 'object architecture' in URI working group

>The IETF _should_not_ standardise on an object system architecture.
>It should develop architectural frameworks within which future object
>system architectures can exist and be exploited.

The IETF should stay with protocols, working to ensure interoperability.

This has been the formula for its unparalleled success (viz ISO).
/r$

- Next message: Mark Madsen: "Distributed Objects for Internet Architecture"
- Previous message: Leslie Daigle: "Re: URI Revised charter"
- Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "no 'object architecture' in URI working group"