# Re: Whither URI: Revising the charter, disband URI?

Rich Salz (rsalz@osf.org)
Tue, 11 Jul 1995 01:43:22 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Mark Madsen: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Previous message: Daniel LaLiberte: "Path URN Specification"
- Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "Whither URI: Revising the charter, disband URI?"

    From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>

    Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 01:43:22 -0400

    Message-Id: <9507110543.AA03514@sulphur.osf.org>

    To: msm@ansa.co.uk, owner-uri@bunyip.com, rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov

    Subject: Re: Whither URI: Revising the charter, disband URI?

>Yes, there is a good case for a general object architecture. That's what

I believe IETF-based attempts to define an object architecture are
likely to run right into the bet-the-company efforts being done
by IBM (SOM), HP (Corba), Sun (corba), Microsoft (COM/OLE), Digital
(ObjectBroker?), etc.

I'd try to avoid objects if at all possible.
/r$

- Next message: Mark Madsen: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Previous message: Daniel LaLiberte: "Path URN Specification"
- Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "Whither URI: Revising the charter, disband URI?"