# URC vs IAFA Templates

Jon P. Knight (J.P.Knight@lut.ac.uk)
Tue, 27 Sep 1994 16:21:58 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Owen Rees: "Re: (r.vasudevan 19) XFN Specification"
- Previous message: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov: "Re: Proposed change to URN Requirements document"
- Next in thread: Michael Mealling: "Re: URC vs IAFA Templates"
- Reply: Michael Mealling: "Re: URC vs IAFA Templates"
- Reply: Michael Mealling: "Re: URC vs IAFA Templates"
- Reply: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov: "Re: URC vs IAFA Templates"

    Date: Tue, 27 Sep 1994 16:21:58 +0100 (BST)

    From: "Jon P. Knight" <J.P.Knight@lut.ac.uk>

    Subject: URC vs IAFA Templates

    To: uri@bunyip.com

    Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9409271511.B3780-a100000@suna>

Am I right in thinking that there may be some mileage in trying to bring
IAFA templates and URCs together? I see that in October last year there
was some discussion of this (see the thread starting with
<URL:http://www.acl.lanl.gov/URI/archive/uri-93q4.messages/296.html>) but
did this reach any conclusions? As the IAFA templates are now much firmer
and the URL/URN documents are more or less out of the way, would now be a
good time to start thinking about this again? Or have things moved on as
far as URCs are concerned and I've missed them?

Jon

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jon Knight, Research Student in High Performance Networking and Distributed
Systems in the Department of _Computer_Studies_ at Loughborough University.
* It's not how big your share is, its how much you share that's important *

- Next message: Owen Rees: "Re: (r.vasudevan 19) XFN Specification"
- Previous message: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov: "Re: Proposed change to URN Requirements document"
- Next in thread: Michael Mealling: "Re: URC vs IAFA Templates"
- Reply: Michael Mealling: "Re: URC vs IAFA Templates"
- Reply: Michael Mealling: "Re: URC vs IAFA Templates"
- Reply: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov: "Re: URC vs IAFA Templates"