# caching

Karen R. Sollins (sollins@lcs.mit.edu)
Tue, 15 Feb 94 19:49:04 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Josh Osborne: "Re: [connolly@hal.com: Re: Identifying scripts by file extension?]"
- Previous message: Dave Brennan: "Re: URN functional spec"
- Next in thread: Michael Mealling: "Re: caching"
- Reply: Michael Mealling: "Re: caching"
- Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: caching"

    Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 19:49:04 -0500

    Message-Id: <9402160049.AA02520@zippy.lcs.mit.edu>

    From: Karen R. Sollins <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>

    To: timbl@www0.cern.ch

    In-Reply-To: Tim Berners-Lee's message of Mon, 14 Feb 94 12:20:12 +0100 <9402141120.AA01384@ptpc00.cern.ch>

    Subject: caching

Tim,
Good point. Can someone please argue for why we should have some
support for caching in the URN functional spec, if anyone has a strong
opinion on this subject? (I certainly can't.) I believe that several
people, at least, in Houston, felt strongly about this, which is why
it's in. If there are no opinions about it, can we please have some
murmuring to remove it.
Karen

- Next message: Josh Osborne: "Re: [connolly@hal.com: Re: Identifying scripts by file extension?]"
- Previous message: Dave Brennan: "Re: URN functional spec"
- Next in thread: Michael Mealling: "Re: caching"
- Reply: Michael Mealling: "Re: caching"
- Reply: Keith Moore: "Re: caching"