# Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful

Michael Mealling (Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu)
Tue, 20 Jun 1995 15:41:15 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Leslie Daigle: "Re: whither URI"
- Previous message: Kee Hinckley: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"
- In reply to: Fisher Mark: "URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Next in thread: Fisher Mark: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"

    From: Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu (Michael Mealling)

    Message-Id: <199506201941.PAA20152@oit.gatech.edu>

    Subject: Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful

    To: FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com (Fisher Mark)

    Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 15:41:15 -0400 (EDT)

    In-Reply-To: <2FE701FD@MSMAIL.INDY.TCE.COM> from "Fisher Mark" at Jun 20, 95 10:05:00 am

Fisher Mark said this:
> A URN, in my view, should be separate from the method and/or path used to
> resolve it.

I completely and utterly agree with this statement and every statement made
in the original email. Dead on, man!

-MM ;-)

    --
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Life is a game. Someone wins and someone loses. Get used to it.
    <BR>
    <HR><A HREF="http://www.gatech.edu/michael.html">Michael Mealling</A>

- Next message: Leslie Daigle: "Re: whither URI"
- Previous message: Kee Hinckley: "Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )"
- In reply to: Fisher Mark: "URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"
- Next in thread: Fisher Mark: "Re: URN Resolution Paths Considered Harmful"