Message-Id: <9404061613.AA00299@emmetal.cs.wisc.edu>
To: uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: Seattle minutes
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 1994 11:13:45 -0500
From: Bob Kummerfeld <bob@cs.wisc.edu>
In message <9404060312.AA14442@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu>, Alexsander Totic writes:
>
>The hard issues arise when designing a protocol for URN->URC resolution.
>What should be in this protocol? Should the protocol be really simple,
>with a single GET command, or should we add facilities for searching,
>database updating, etc. Would a single protocol for different URN->URC
>scenarios be desired at all?
>
Surely we should be considering whois++ for URN->URC resolution without
inventing a new directory lookup system?
URCs should fit nicely into whois++ templates.
Bob Kummerfeld