Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 15:02:17 PDT
From: strasen.ES_AE@xerox.com
Subject: Forwarding: Re: "why isn't IETF using FPIs?"
To: uri@bunyip.com
Message-Id: <"20-Oct-94 15:02:07".*.Steve_Strasen.ES_AE@Xerox.com>
----- Begin Forwarded Messages -----
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 94 15:36:46 PDT
Sender: mitra%pandora.sf.ca.us@byoc-15.wc.ncsa.EDU
From: mitra@path.NET
Subject: Re: "why isn't IETF using FPIs?"
To: Steve_Strasen.ES_AE@Xerox.com
cc: masinter@parc.xerox.COM, Steve_Strasen.ES_AE@Xerox.com
Message-ID: <aacb085503021004998b@[198.133.26.187]>
<----RFC822 headers-----
Received: from pandora.sf.ca.us ([192.190.111.22]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14610(6)>; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 15:36:46 PDT
Received: from byoc-15.wc.ncsa.edu by pandora.sf.ca.us id aa12965;
19 Oct 94 15:35 PDT
X-Sender: mitra@red.path.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: mitra@path.net (Mitra)
-----RFC822 headers---->
>Many companies (including Xerox) already have ASN.1 object identifiers
>and/or >public identifier owner names assigned to them.
This is the key sentence.... Steve, many companies have ASN.1 object
identifiers, this compares with hundreds of thousands that have Domain
names, to map ASN.1 object identifiers into resolver names would be a task
with a size of hte same order as recreating DNS!
If we want to continue this discussion any further I strongly suggest
moving it to teh list (uri@bunyip.com).
- Mitra
=======================================================================
Mitra mitra@path.net
Internet Consulting (415)488-0944
<http://www.path.net/mitra> fax (415)488-0988
----- End Forwarded Messages -----